c model ISR_TJ
c  /home/toda/src/NuSMV-2.6.0-Linux_untouched/binary/bin/NuSMV -bmc -bmc_length 100 -n 0 /home/toda/2022solver/bin/../tmp/myciel3_01.smv > myciel3_01.log
c ECC Heuristic Algorithm by Alessio Conte, Roberto Grossi and Andrea Marino. University of Pisa.
c This code is compiled using Java 1.8
c Parsing: 11
c Reading graph from file..
c Removing duplicates.................
c Done.
c Algotithm object created, class=it.unipi.di.clq.eps.lists.EPSc
c Edges: 20
c 0 cliques
c 2 cliques
c 4 cliques
c 8 cliques
c 16 cliques
c The solution is correct.
c Cliques: 20
c Sum: 40
c MaxSize: 0
c Time: 10
c Aborted: false
c ML = 10
c SIZE = 11
c Removed 0 cliques to minimalize solution.
c Result saved!
c Clique size distribution: {[2,20]}
c NODE covering index distribution:{[3,5][4,5][5,1]}
c EDGE covering index distrubution:{[1,20]}
c Total edges:20
c Distributions saved!
c *** This is NuSMV 2.6.0 (compiled on Wed Oct 14 15:36:56 2015)
c *** Enabled addons are: compass
c *** For more information on NuSMV see <http://nusmv.fbk.eu>
c *** or email to <nusmv-users@list.fbk.eu>.
c *** Please report bugs to <Please report bugs to <nusmv-users@fbk.eu>>
c 
c *** Copyright (c) 2010-2014, Fondazione Bruno Kessler
c 
c *** This version of NuSMV is linked to the CUDD library version 2.4.1
c *** Copyright (c) 1995-2004, Regents of the University of Colorado
c 
c *** This version of NuSMV is linked to the MiniSat SAT solver. 
c *** See http://minisat.se/MiniSat.html
c *** Copyright (c) 2003-2006, Niklas Een, Niklas Sorensson
c *** Copyright (c) 2007-2010, Niklas Sorensson
c 
c -- no counterexample found with bound 0
c -- no counterexample found with bound 1
c -- specification  G ((((state.token[1] = v3 & state.token[2] = v6) & state.token[3] = v8) & state.token[4] = v9) ->  G !((((((state.token[1] = v3 | state.token[1] = v4) | state.token[1] = v8) | state.token[1] = v9) & (((state.token[2] = v3 | state.token[2] = v4) | state.token[2] = v8) | state.token[2] = v9)) & (((state.token[3] = v3 | state.token[3] = v4) | state.token[3] = v8) | state.token[3] = v9)) & (((state.token[4] = v3 | state.token[4] = v4) | state.token[4] = v8) | state.token[4] = v9)))    is false
c -- as demonstrated by the following execution sequence
c Trace Description: BMC Counterexample 
c Trace Type: Counterexample 
c   -> State: 1.1 <-
c     state.token[1] = 0ud20_33304
c     state.token[2] = 0ud20_397312
c     state.token[3] = 0ud20_70
c     state.token[4] = 0ud20_67840
c     state.tid = 1
c     state.vid = 4
c     state.target = 0ud20_0
c     v11 = 0ud20_150530
c     v10 = 0ud20_49153
c     v9 = 0ud20_67840
c     v8 = 0ud20_70
c     v7 = 0ud20_1072
c     v6 = 0ud20_397312
c     v5 = 0ud20_456
c     v4 = 0ud20_786561
c     v3 = 0ud20_33304
c     v2 = 0ud20_12804
c     v1 = 0ud20_598048
c     v0 = 0ud20_0
c   -> State: 1.2 <-
c     state.tid = 2
c     state.vid = 5
c     state.target = 0ud20_786561
c   -> State: 1.3 <-
c     state.token[2] = 0ud20_786561
c     state.tid = 1
c     state.vid = 1
c     state.target = 0ud20_456
s 6 8 9 10
t 3 4 8 9
a YES
a 6 8 9 10
a 3 6 8 9
a 3 4 8 9